ΣΧΟΛΙΟ ΙΣΤΟΛΟΓΙΟΥ : Ο Milley είπε ακριβώς αυτό που είχαμε υποδείξει εμείς πριν έναν χρόνο ΕΔΩ και ΕΔΩ. Όταν γράφαμε ότι είτε η Αμερική θα αλλάξει τον τρόπο πολέμου, είτε θα χάσει τον επόμενο μεγάλο πόλεμο. Χθές ο Milley είπε ... “I would argue that today [we] are in the middle of a fundamental change in the character of war,” δηλαδή ότι βρίσκονται στην μέση μιας θεμελιώδους αλλαγής στον χαρακτήρα του πολέμου.!!! Ω ναι μας διαβάζουν σίγουρα. Το μόνο που δεν έχουμε γράψει ακόμα είναι το πως και με τι τρόπο μπορεί να νικήσει κανείς την Κίνα.! Αλλά αυτό δεν θα το πούμε μέχρι να μας δώσουνε το κεφάλι της Τουρκίας στο πιάτο.
Army Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, speaks in a virtual meeting during a U.S. Naval War College Advanced Flag and Executive Course (AFLEX) at the Pentagon on Oct. 26, 2020. DoD PhotoThe world is in the midst of a fundamental change in the character of warfare as a variety of nations begin to field directed energy, hypersonics and autonomous systems, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said on Thursday.
“I would argue that today [we] are in the middle of a fundamental
change in the character of war,” Gen. Mark Milley said during the U.S.
Naval Institute’s Defense Forum Washington conference on Thursday.
“The nature of war is probably not going to change, but the character of war does change and it changes frequently.”
Speaking at the Naval Institute and earlier this week at the Brookings Institution, Milley laid out how he sees the roles of the U.S. military services changing in light of the new technologies.
“It is conceivable, theoretically conceivable that in some point in the future you could have entire tank units without crews, or entire squadrons without pilots, ships or carrier strike groups without sailors. Not say it’s going to happen [but] it’s theoretically possible. So robotics is coming on and it’s going to have a military application in the not very distant future,” he said at Brookings.
Milley used the example of precision weapons, almost exclusively an American military advantage during the Cold War and certainly in the first Gulf War, as how quickly technology can change warfare and spread.
“Now they’re almost ubiquitous,” with nations like Iran using them to attack Saudi Arabian oil production facilities in 2019, he said.
In the near future, Milley said robotics, which are already widely used in the commercial sector;” “incredibly powerful” artificial intelligence; hypersonics; “and five or 10 [other] rapidly approaching technologies” will have a profound impact on the armed forces in organization, doctrine and training.
China is the key adversary the U.S. is crafting its next phase of security planning around.
“They are developing an exceptionally strong military that is going
to be capable in space and cyber, on the sea, land and air,” Milley said
at the Naval Institute.
“They have a very deliberate plan and a vision of the future. It’s very
calibrated and they know the interim objectives that they’re trying to
meet with their intent. Their intent is to essentially match the United
States, military capability and capacity by call it the mid 2030-ish
timeframe, 2035. And they would like to not only match but to exceed is
to dominate us, to be able to beat us in armed conflict by the
mid-century.”
The stakes are far higher now with nuclear weapons in the arsenals of a number of countries, including North Korea as well as the U.S., China and Russia.
The question remains “how do you deter [a potential adversary] from even thinking they could be successful” in a military strike against the United States. He answered his own question by emphasizing communicating “clearly and unambiguously” with other nations if A happens the United States will react.
Milley said that means the United States needs to remain strong economically, diplomatically and militarily to maintain credible deterrence. It also translates into maintaining strong alliances with like-minded nations in NATO and the Indo-Pacific region.
Looking at budget numbers in the immediate future, Milley said a “reality check” means there likely will be a flattening budget or Pentagon spending “could actually decline significantly.” The Defense Department’s budget is now at about $750 billion annually.
If the Pentagon needed to reorient its priorities with a lower topline, the current National Defense Strategy would lean toward naval power, Milley said.
“The fundamental defense of the United States, and the ability to project power forward is going to be naval and air and space power,” he said.
The nation’s priority is “taking care of the COVID pandemic and to breathe new life into the economy.”
“We have to take a hard look at what we do … everything we do” from overseas bases to deployments and exercises to control spending. He asked rhetorically, “is everyone of those necessary for the defense of the United States.” In an answer to a related question, Milley said the department is on course to reduce American forces in Afghanistan and Iraq to 2,500 service members in each country by Jan. 15. He described the 19-year campaign in Afghanistan as having achieved “a modicum of success.”
With the exception of pilots and cyber specialists, “recruiting has been pretty good.”
Milley said the armed services learned much about dealing with COVID-19 from what happened aboard carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) and destroyer USS Kidd (DDG-100) that led to changes in training schedules and operations “to protect the force” against its spread.
“We’re unique [with] a hierarchical structure” that is able to “issue orders and people follow them.” He also said the military benefitted from having a young, physically fit work force in its ranks.
At the peak of the pandemic late last winter and early spring, Milley said more than 60,000 service members and the Navy’s hospital ships were employed to help or supplement civilian health care workers and facilities. He estimated 20,000 to 23,000 are continuing to provide this supplemental care in civilian communities today.
He added the department is “committed to Warp Speed” in the distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines, which the FDA is slated to review for emergency approval.
3 σχόλια:
Αλλά αυτό δεν θα το πούμε μέχρι να μας δώσουνε το κεφάλι της Τουρκίας στο πιάτο.
...........................................................................
Είσαι με τα καλά σου, Λύκαστρε; Δίνε τέτοιες ιδέες και σε βλέπω μια μέρα, και δια της ατόπου απαγωγής, εις τα ατλαντικά άδυτα της βασιλίσσης Σοφίας
να δίνεις μαρτυρικάς εξετάσεις πληροφορικής.
Αυτό κι αν δεν θα είναι εις τα πλαίσια of a fundamental change in the character of war. Αλλά πας γυρεύοντας βλέπεις. Εγώ σε προειδοποίησα πάντως.
Μη φοβού για μένα αγαπητέ φίλε.! Με συγκινεί όμως η ανησυχία σου για μένα. Είναι γνωστό ότι το είδος τους, δεν διαθέτει φαντασία, όπως έχουμε εμείς οι Έλληνες. Για αυτό και βάζουν σε όλα τα σημαντικά πόστα για αυτούς ελληνικής καταγωγής ανθρώπους, σαν την Σταυρίδου στην DARPA (κέντρο έρευνας και τεχνολογίας του αμερικανικού Πενταγώνου) αλλά και μέσα στην NASA...και όχι αμερικάνους.
Aυτό είναι κάτι που το γνωρίζουν και οι ίδιοι, μπορεί να έχουν τεχνολογία, χρήμα , μέσα και όλους τους εξοπλισμούς, όμως δεν διαθέτουν ΦΑΝΤΑΣΙΑ, και δεν μπορούν να ΔΟΥΝ ΤΟ ΜΕΛΛΟΝ.!! Και επειδή διαβάζουν ΟΛΑ τα αρχαιοελληνικά κείμενα και μάλιστα στα αρχαία ελληνικά γνωρίζουν ότι δίχως Αχιλλέα (Ελλάδα) Τροία/Ασία ΔΕΝ ΠΕΦΤΕΙ. Δεν χρειάζεται να τους το πω εγώ...το γνωρίζουν.
Όχι απλά της Τουρκίας.... Αυτό είναι κάτι εύκολο για αυτούς, το δικό τους Βασίλειο για να συνεχίσουν απλά να υπάρχουν
Δημοσίευση σχολίου